|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: correlation function
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg128758] Re: correlation function
- From: jure lapajne <lapajne.jure at gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 03:30:14 -0500 (EST)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
- References: <k8jsri$5n9$1@smc.vnet.net>
Professor (physicist) said this function is called correlation function. Than I talked to someone from mathematics department and he said it's some sort of discrete convolution, so it really depends on person, how he/she calls it. ListConvolve and ListCorrelate should give same results when given right parameters. I think there is something strange about my data (linked in previous post), because I also have some other data and when I use them I get correct (same) results. I tried all the code in above answers and with given data nothing works. I think I'll just use fourier transform method because it returns symmetric data (which is correct) in contrast to ListCorrelate and ListConvolve which return asymmetric data.
Thank you all.
Prev by Date:
Re: question about NIntegrate
Next by Date:
Re: Integer Length Count
Previous by thread:
Re: correlation function
Next by thread:
Re: correlation function
|