Re: Stylesheet for input side by side with output

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg128271] Re: Stylesheet for input side by side with output*From*: David Reiss <dbreiss at gmail.com>*Date*: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 03:08:29 -0400 (EDT)*Delivered-to*: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com*Delivered-to*: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com*Delivered-to*: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net*Delivered-to*: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net*References*: <20120923070153.D9CA26877@smc.vnet.net> <k466qk$a8c$1@smc.vnet.net>

By the way, the part that I didn't put in the margin is that, for the approach I am suggesting, the resulting input will no longer be executable. One cold add a button to the Cell's "ornamentation" to toggle back to the original top to bottom linear layout.... --David On Sep 29, 3:10 am, Brentt <brenttnew... at gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you, I was thinking it could probably be done if I got down and dirty > with some notebook programming. As for the margins, I'm thinking it would > work well for doing scratch calculations, as in those times I usually have > a lot of real estate on the right and find myself wanting to look at > results and input separately. > > Fermat was proven correct in two respects I suppose: the theorem is > (apparently) correct, and there actually wasn't enough room in the margins > for the proof. > > Fermat was proved correct in two respects: that proof really couldn't have > fit in the margins. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Brentt <brenttnew... at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thank you for the suggestions :) > > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:12 AM, christopher arthur < > > chris.arth... at gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > > You could use authortools "makebilateralcells" afterwards...but it > > > wouldn't be automatic. > > > > Brentt a =E9crit : > > > > Hi, is there a way to make input on the left side of the screen, and > > then > > > > output appear on the right side of the screen? For example instead of > > the > > > > default notebook style > > > > > Input[n]: foo > > > > Output[m]: bar > > > > > have > > > > > Input[n]: foo | Output[m]: bar > > > > > where there is some sort of split screen type divider. Seems to me like > > > it > > > > would be a nicer way to work.