[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Assuming and Integrate
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg128328] Re: Assuming and Integrate
*From*: Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu>
*Date*: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 01:31:55 -0400 (EDT)
*Delivered-to*: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
*Delivered-to*: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
*Delivered-to*: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
*Delivered-to*: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
*References*: <20121006055312.C0D5B6908@smc.vnet.net>
How to treat exceptional cases, here m = n an integer, is always an issue with Integrate (and other operations). Here one would hope to see at least a ConditionalExpression for the general situation Element[{n,m}, Integers]. After all, such integrals are so common in Fourier analysis.
Perhaps this should even be reported as a bug to Wolfram Research.
On Oct 6, 2012, at 1:53 AM, hamiltoncycle at gmail.com wrote:
> When I try the line below in Mathematica 8 I get the answer 0 which is what I expect when m and n are different but not when m=n. Can anyone explain how to do this correctly?
>
> Assuming[Element[{n, m}, Integers], Integrate[Sin[n*x]*Sin[m*x], {x, 0, Pi}]]
>
> When m=n we should get Pi/2, as in this case:
>
> Assuming[Element[n, Integers], Integrate[Sin[n*x]*Sin[n*x], {x, 0, Pi}]]
>
---
Murray Eisenberg
murray at math.umass.edu
Mathematics & Statistics Dept.
Lederle Graduate Research Tower phone 413 549-1020 (H)
University of Massachusetts 413 545-2859 (W)
710 North Pleasant Street fax 413 545-1801
Amherst, MA 01003-9305
Prev by Date:
**Re: Trouble Loading Packages...**
Next by Date:
**Re: Clearing all variables and definitions: i.e. "resetting" mathematica**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Assuming and Integrate**
Next by thread:
**Re: Assuming and Integrate**
| |