MathGroup Archive 2013

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Stephen Wolfram's recent blog

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg129828] Re: Stephen Wolfram's recent blog
  • From: Murray Eisenberg <murrayeisenberg at gmail.com>
  • Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 04:09:33 -0500 (EST)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
  • References: <17970505.41376.1360749164450.JavaMail.root@m06> <20130214071039.1C141692F@smc.vnet.net> <6677682.92132.1360917763169.JavaMail.root@m06> <20130216061024.D0AE569B7@smc.vnet.net>

To the contrary, I find the new (by default) auto-completion a 
significant improvement over having to use Ctrl+K. E.g., say I want to 
type ChiDistribution. I type 'Chi' and get the drop-down list of 3 
possible completions. Only one of these 3 has 'D' as the next letter. So 
I just type 'D' and press Return. Mathematica completes the rest.

That's a fairly short example. I've found that I can type long 
expressions, with many names in them (`System or `Global) much faster 
now.

This helps makes up for Mathematica's verbose descriptive language, in 
contrast with languages where names are short but often cryptic.

On Feb 16, 2013, at 1:10 AM, "djmpark" <djmpark at comcast.net> wrote:

> ...All the doo-dads are to me a nuisance. The one thing I liked was 
the Ctrl+K
> (which I could type faster than you can say Jack Rabbit) command 
completion.
> But now Ctrl+K is gone and what replaces it is ill-conceived and 
horrible.

---
Murray Eisenberg                                    murray at math.umass.edu
Mathematics & Statistics Dept.      
Lederle Graduate Research Tower            phone 413 549-1020 (H)
University of Massachusetts                               413 545-2838 (W)
710 North Pleasant Street                         fax   413 545-1801
Amherst, MA 01003-9305








  • Prev by Date: Re: Speak Command in Ver 9
  • Next by Date: Re: barchart
  • Previous by thread: Re: Stephen Wolfram's recent blog
  • Next by thread: Re: Stephen Wolfram's recent blog