MathGroup Archive 2013

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Stephen Wolfram's recent blog


It seems to me that this option has always been there. Just go to 
Preferences:Interface and uncheck "Enable autocompletion". Then, at 
least on the Macintosh, Command+K works as before.

Andrzej Kozlowski


On 17 Feb 2013, at 10:10, djmpark <djmpark at comcast.net> wrote:

> To each his own. To me it's like constantly swatting away flies. I would
> prefer that WRI gave us the additional option of restoring Ctrl+K. After
> all, they have retained Ctrl+Shift+K.
>
>
> David Park
> djmpark at comcast.net
> http://home.comcast.net/~djmpark/index.html
>
>
> From: Murray Eisenberg [mailto:murrayeisenberg at gmail.com]
>
>
> To the contrary, I find the new (by default) auto-completion a significant
> improvement over having to use Ctrl+K. E.g., say I want to type
> ChiDistribution. I type 'Chi' and get the drop-down list of 3 possible
> completions. Only one of these 3 has 'D' as the next letter. So I just type
> 'D' and press Return. Mathematica completes the rest.
>
> That's a fairly short example. I've found that I can type long expressions,
> with many names in them (`System or `Global) much faster now.
>
> This helps makes up for Mathematica's verbose descriptive language, in
> contrast with languages where names are short but often cryptic.
>
> On Feb 16, 2013, at 1:10 AM, "djmpark" <djmpark at comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> ...All the doo-dads are to me a nuisance. The one thing I liked was
>> the Ctrl+K (which I could type faster than you can say Jack Rabbit)
> command completion.
>> But now Ctrl+K is gone and what replaces it is ill-conceived and horrible.
>
> ---
> Murray Eisenberg                                    murray at math.umass.edu
> Mathematics & Statistics Dept.      
> Lederle Graduate Research Tower            phone 413 549-1020 (H)
> University of Massachusetts                               413 545-2838 (W)
> 710 North Pleasant Street                         fax   413 545-1801
> Amherst, MA 01003-9305
>
>
>
>
>
>




  • Prev by Date: Re: Low precision exponentiation
  • Next by Date: Re: Stephen Wolfram's recent blog
  • Previous by thread: Re: Stephen Wolfram's recent blog
  • Next by thread: Re: Stephen Wolfram's recent blog