An analytical solution to an integral not currently in Mathematica?

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg131372] An analytical solution to an integral not currently in Mathematica?
• From: Sean McBride <rprogrammer at gmail.com>
• Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 01:48:46 -0400 (EDT)
• Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
• Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
• Delivered-to: mathgroup-outx@smc.vnet.net
• Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsendx@smc.vnet.net

```Question: Integral dx of 1/sqrt(Log[x] + a*x + b)
(sorry if my notation is off; I just used the online integrator and don't have Mathematica proper, http://integrals.wolfram.com/index.jsp?expr=1%2Fsqrt%28Log%5Bx%5D+%2B+a*x+%2B+b%29)
(the online integrator returned this as of the time of writing this (2013-07-13): "Mathematica could not find a formula for your integral. Most likely this means that no formula exists." )

Another system's unconfirmed answer (in that notation; sorry) (version 5.27.0): -sqrt(%pi)*%i*%e^(-a*x-b)*erf(%i*sqrt(log(x)+a*x+b))

Strangely, the other system only produces this result when given, say, x(t) in all places for x (including variable of integration).

I can't seem to get the other system to verify its result symbolically, but when I try random numerical sampling, it does seem to agree, albeit horribly plagued by floating point errors for large x.

Can anyone offer insight, or possibly prove it's correctness or incorrectness? :)

(P.S. I just joined this group, so apologies if it's the wrong one or I'm not following guidelines)

```

• Prev by Date: Re: What is the actual simulation time of NDSolve?
• Next by Date: Re: MCMC in Mathematica
• Previous by thread: maze generation
• Next by thread: Re: An analytical solution to an integral not currently