[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
MarcumQ and Speeding-up Computations
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg131379] MarcumQ and Speeding-up Computations
*From*: bruce.colletti at gmail.com
*Date*: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 05:58:06 -0400 (EDT)
*Delivered-to*: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
*Delivered-to*: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
*Delivered-to*: mathgroup-outx@smc.vnet.net
*Delivered-to*: mathgroup-newsendx@smc.vnet.net
Re 9.0.1 under Windows 7.
Here I find the expected value of a MarcumQ function over a 3D-domain whose joint probability density function is f.
How can I more quickly compute the answer 0.930445?
I think the domain causes the long computation time (if I had only one computation, this would be okay--but I have many). I had hoped simulation would give a good estimate but it didn't. I can't figure out how to use Compile with Expectation.
My hunch says that any increase in speed will come from using some bizarre fact that applies the MarcumQ function to chi-square tests. I've looked for such results but have come up dry.
Any ideas to speed up Mathematica computations? Thanks.
Bruce
Remove@s;
f = ProbabilityDistribution[Piecewise@{{6, x1 + x2 + x3 <= 1}},
{x1, 0, 1}, {x2, 0, 1}, {x3, 0, 1}];
q = {0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4};
t = Array[s, 3];
t = Append[t, 1 - Total@t];
Timing@N@Expectation[
MarcumQ[3/2, Sqrt[ 50 Total@(((q - t)^2)/q)], Sqrt[7.8]],
Most@t \[Distributed] f]
{555.613162, 0.930445}
Prev by Date:
**reduce needs too much memory**
Next by Date:
**Re: An analytical solution to an integral not currently**
Previous by thread:
**reduce needs too much memory**
Next by thread:
**Does mathematica have any measures of bilateral distance in a**
| |