Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2013

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Applying Mathematica to practical problems

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg130989] Re: Applying Mathematica to practical problems
  • From: Richard Fateman <fateman at cs.berkeley.edu>
  • Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 06:27:28 -0400 (EDT)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-outx@smc.vnet.net
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsendx@smc.vnet.net
  • References: <kmngb2$3rv$1@smc.vnet.net> <20130519095011.606CD6A14@smc.vnet.net> <20130530101525.2281869F1@smc.vnet.net> <ko9ipa$kde$1@smc.vnet.net>

On 5/31/2013 12:16 AM, Andrzej Kozlowski wrote:
> Excuse me? I have always assumed that every number system has at least
> one finite number x such that x+1=x, this follows from the group
> axiom. Also, by the way, if we are talking about group addition then
> "x ==0  and  x+1 == x"   is a not very economical way to express
> x==0.


I think that Andrzej is misreading/ miswriting...

It is fine to have an element x such that   x+1=1.  That
number is the identity under addition, or zero.

It is not ok to have an element such that  x+1=x.

(When x and 1 are supposed to be modeling the real numbers).


As for the rest of the attacks...

z = 1.11111111111111111111;While[(z = 2*z - z) != 0, Print[z]]

Well, see it for yourself (in Mathematica 9) and decide if anyone would
find it so confusing.

Mathematica 9  has adopted my suggestion that numbers with no precision 
be displayed differently (in a red box).  Prior versions (up to 7 or 8?)
just displayed 0.

Andrzej misconstrues my comments principally in the sense that he
assumes I think it is OK to have a design that gives naive users wrong
answers if it is possible for a skilled user to bypass the
potential disasters by switching arithmetic (etc.)

No, it is a bad design.

The rest of Andrzej's comments are, I think not worth responding to.








  • Prev by Date: Re: Warsaw Univ. course, was Re: Work on Basic Mathematica Stephen!
  • Next by Date: Re: Applying Mathematica to practical problems
  • Previous by thread: Re: Warsaw Univ. course, was Re: Work on Basic Mathematica Stephen!
  • Next by thread: Re: Applying Mathematica to practical problems