[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Quantity
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg131722] Re: Quantity
*From*: H. Keßler <kessler.hannes at gmail.com>
*Date*: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 22:00:30 -0400 (EDT)
*Delivered-to*: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
*Delivered-to*: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
*Delivered-to*: mathgroup-outx@smc.vnet.net
*Delivered-to*: mathgroup-newsendx@smc.vnet.net
*References*: <l1m2is$cbe$1@smc.vnet.net>
Am Sonntag, 22. September 2013 08:26:36 UTC+2 schrieb Bill Rowe:
> On 9/21/13 at 4:35 AM, kessler.hannes at gmail.com (H. Ke=C3=9Fler) wrote:
>
>
>
> >But what I am especially looking for is the list of the unit strings
>
> >in the correct spelling for Mathematica in
>
> >Quantity[magnitude,unitstring], not only the general overview of
>
> >units in the NIST-website. In the old Units-package (Mathematica 8
>
> >and earlier) each unit was a symbol and a list of all units
>
> >available could be obtained in the correct format and spelling by
>
> >?Units`*. This is obviously not possible anymore as there is no
>
> >package and all units are strings.
>
>
>
> There does not seem to be a specific set of unit strings. Note
>
> that doing:
>
>
>
> In[1]:= UnitConvert[Quantity[12., "Feet"], "Meters"]
>
>
>
> Out[1]= 3.6576 m
>
>
>
> returns a result essentially immediately. But doing
>
>
>
> In[2]:= UnitConvert[Quantity[12., "Foot"], "Meters"]
>
>
>
> Out[2]= 3.6576 m
>
>
>
> returns the same result after a small delay. You should see a
>
> brief message indicating Mathematica is interpreting the units.
>
> I believe what is happening here is Mathematica is using Wolfram
>
> Alpha to interpret the unit string which increases the allowable
>
> number of unit strings significantly and makes it essentially
>
> impossible for a user to create a list of allowable unit strings.
Hello Bill,
you are right, Mathematica seems to call Wolfram Alpha. However, I cannot use this feature as the internet connection to Wolfram Alpha is blocked in my company. Therefore I would be interested in a solution which does not rely on Wolfram Alpha.
Best regards,
Hannes
Prev by Date:
**a queue**
Next by Date:
**Re: Data set association, returning values**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Quantity**
Next by thread:
**Re: Quantity**
| |