Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2014

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Result to DEQ with WA versus Step-by-Step Yields

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg132317] Re: Result to DEQ with WA versus Step-by-Step Yields
  • From: Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357 at gmail.com>
  • Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 04:03:10 -0500 (EST)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-outx@smc.vnet.net
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsendx@smc.vnet.net
  • References: <20140201055416.D6FE16A13@smc.vnet.net>

I refer frequently to the online documentation and experiment when the
results are not what I would initially guess.


Bob Hanlon


On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:08 AM, amzoti <amzoti at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Thanks all!
>
> Bob Hanlon: I see that you reply to many posting with excellent feedback.
>
> I have always wondered (as your posts are different than many in a very
> good way), how did you learn Mathematica so well?
>
> What approach and/or references did you use?
>
> Regards -A
>
>


  • Prev by Date: Re: Embedding CDF in a Google Spreadsheet Form
  • Next by Date: Re: Memory leaks problem
  • Previous by thread: Re: Result to DEQ with WA versus Step-by-Step Yields
  • Next by thread: Re: Learning to Program in Mathematica