Re: Result to DEQ with WA versus Step-by-Step Yields
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg132317] Re: Result to DEQ with WA versus Step-by-Step Yields
- From: Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357 at gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 04:03:10 -0500 (EST)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-outx@smc.vnet.net
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsendx@smc.vnet.net
- References: <20140201055416.D6FE16A13@smc.vnet.net>
I refer frequently to the online documentation and experiment when the results are not what I would initially guess. Bob Hanlon On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:08 AM, amzoti <amzoti at gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks all! > > Bob Hanlon: I see that you reply to many posting with excellent feedback. > > I have always wondered (as your posts are different than many in a very > good way), how did you learn Mathematica so well? > > What approach and/or references did you use? > > Regards -A > >