Student Support Forum: 'FullSimplify: Mathematica 9 vs. Mathematica 8' topicStudent Support Forum > General > "FullSimplify: Mathematica 9 vs. Mathematica 8"

 < Previous Comment | Next Comment > Help | Reply To Comment | Reply To Topic
 Author Comment/Response Steve Keeley 12/31/12 3:57pm I opened your file in M8 and evaluated the notebook. It ran rapidly until the line in input 17 that reads: riem = ered[ Table[D[gam[[i, j, l]], co[[k]]] - D[gam[[i, j, k]], co[[l]]] + Sum[gam[[i, p, k]] gam[[p, j, l]] - gam[[i, p, l]] gam[[p, j, k]], {p, 4}], {i, 4}, {j, 4}, {k, 4}, {l, 4}]]; That line generated four errors: Part::partd: Part specification gam[[1,1,1]] is longer than depth of object. >> Part::partd: Part specification co[[1]] is longer than depth of object. >> Part::partd: Part specification gam[[1,1,1]] is longer than depth of object. >> General::stop: Further output of Part::partd will be suppressed during this calculation. >> After that it just kept running and I aborted the rest. M9 hangs up at the same spot. URL: ,

 Subject (listing for 'FullSimplify: Mathematica 9 vs. Mathematica 8') Author Date Posted FullSimplify: Mathematica 9 vs. Mathematica 8 xenos1984 12/31/12 07:27am Re: FullSimplify: Mathematica 9 vs. Mathematica 8 Steve Keeley 12/31/12 3:57pm Re: Re: FullSimplify: Mathematica 9 vs. Mathema... xenos1984 12/31/12 4:26pm Re: Re: Re: FullSimplify: Mathematica 9 vs. Mat... jf 01/01/13 5:42pm Re: Re: Re: Re: FullSimplify: Mathematica 9 vs.... xenos1984 01/03/13 5:24pm Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: FullSimplify: Mathematica 9... Steve Keeley 01/05/13 6:16pm Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: FullSimplify: Mathemati... xenos1984 01/07/13 5:03pm Another "long M9 calculation time" test case xenos1984 01/08/13 06:47am
 < Previous Comment | Next Comment > Help | Reply To Comment | Reply To Topic