Re: Bug ListPlot?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg2769] Re: Bug ListPlot?
- From: larry_kearney at appsig.com (Lawrence Kearney)
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 1995 01:47:55 -0500
- Organization: Applied Signal Technology
In article <4alt86$qah at dragonfly.wri.com>, wself at viking.emcmt.edu (Will
Self) wrote:
> A student of mine wanted to get plots of some data points. He wanted
> to show the points large and connect them with lines. . Here is what he
> did:
>
> data={{1,1},{2,3},{3,2}}
>
> LogLogListPlot[data,GridLines -> Automatic,
> PlotStyle -> {PointSize[0.04]}]
>
> LogLogListPlot[data,GridLines -> Automatic,
> PlotStyle -> {PointSize[0.04]}, PlotJoined -> True]
>
>
> In the first plot, he got large points but in the second plot the large points
> were absent. He is doing this on a PC. I tried this also on a Macintosh and
> got the same behavior. Would someone try it on somethihng else and see
> what happens? Would you call this a bug in ListPlot?
>
> Will Self
I don't think this is a bug. The generic ListPlot function does not plot
points at the data locations either. In order to get the list to be
plotted with large points at the data locations, I would do the following:
In[9]:=
g1 = LogLogListPlot[data,GridLines->Automatic,
PlotStyle->{PointSize[0.04] },
DisplayFunction -> Identity ];
In[10]:=
g2 = LogLogListPlot[ data, GridLines->Automatic,
PlotStyle -> {PointSize[0.04] },
PlotJoined->True,
DisplayFunction -> Identity ];
In[11]:=
Show[ {g1, g2}, DisplayFunction -> $DisplayFunction ]
--
Larry Kearney | "You want fries with that?"
Applied Signal Technology |
larry_kearney at appsig.com |