Re: Request for MMA benchmarks & platform comparisons
- Subject: [mg2503] Re: Request for MMA benchmarks & platform comparisons
- From: bouldin at ENH.NIST.GOV (Charles Bouldin)
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 06:59:35 GMT
- Approved: usenet@wri.com
- Distribution: local
- Newsgroups: wri.mathgroup
- Organization: NIST
- Sender: daemon at wri.com ( )
In article <486qv9$6co at ralph.vnet.net>, roussel at physics.mcgill.ca (Harold
Roussel) wrote:
[snip]
> So, if I were to pickup a platform-OS combo, it would probably be
> WinNT running on a P6-200. Without doubt the fastest setup for
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> integer-based calculations in MMA (unless you are ready to spend
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Have you run Unterkolfer's benchmarks to back this up? The P6 is touted
regularly on other groups, but I've not seen the MMA tests. If the data
are available, I would love to see them. At this point, I'm very dubious
of the spec tests RUN BY INTEL and would love to see more independent
tests!