Re: Re: Bug in interpretation of mma Series[] command?

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg2287] Re: [mg2268] Re: Bug in interpretation of mma Series[] command?
• From: Richard Mercer <richard at seuss.math.wright.edu>
• Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 12:40:00 -0400

```In view of Dave Withoff's response to this issue, perhaps I was a

His reply was cogent as always and from a system design viewpoint is
definitely the right approach.

for

Exp[-a y^2] * Series[1/(1 + y^2), {y,0,5}]

to act like

Exp[-a y^2] * Normal[Series[1/(1 + y^2), {y,0,5}]]

Reasons:
(1) Most average (nonexpert) users do not have a mental model
corresponding to a SeriesData object; they think of the result of a
Series command as being a polynomial and expect it to behave that way
in calculations.
(2) The structure Series[Exp[-a y^2] * 1/(1 + y^2), {y,0,5}] is
available and much more natural if you want the exponential converted
to a series.

The best solution would seem to be a user-settable "switch" that would
apply Normal to the output of all Series commands. This would
presumably satisfy all those who expect Series objects to act like
polynomials in this and other situations.

One possible way to do this, though far from perfect, is to use

\$Post = (# /.
Literal[SeriesData[stuff__]]:>Normal[SeriesData[stuff]])&;

(You could put this in your init.m file if you really like it.)
Two problems with this:
(1) It can potentially corrupt some things you don't want converted.
(For example, its own output! Try removing the semicolon.)
(2) More importantly, it's an expert solution to a non-expert problem.
The people who can/will do things like this are pretty much the people
for whom it's not necessary.

Richard Mercer

```

• Prev by Date: Re: Spherical Trigonometry Application
• Next by Date: Using Hold, ReleaseHold, and Unevaluated
• Previous by thread: Re: Bug in interpretation of mma Series[] command?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Bug in interpretation of mma Series[] command?