MathGroup Archive 1996

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Notebook==>>>TeX

  • Subject: [mg3168] Re: Notebook==>>>TeX
  • From: news at (News Owner)
  • Date: 14 Feb 1996 02:48:09 -0600
  • Approved:
  • Distribution: local
  • Newsgroups: wri.mathgroup
  • Organization: Uni Ulm
  • Sender: daemon at

In article <4fccqo$9ea at> ianc at (Ian Collier) writes:
>From: ianc at (Ian Collier)
To: mathgroup at
>Subject: Re: Notebok==>>>TeX
>Date: 8 Feb 1996 08:38:48 GMT

>In article <4f962l$dp3 at>, estadistica
><ma1estad at> wrote:

>> Hello,
>>  I woul like to generate a TeX file from a Mathematica *.ma notebook 
>> file.
>> ====>>>> file.tex
>> Could you inform me if has anyone used the Art Ogawa Notebook-to-TeX 
>> mentioned on the preface of Nancy Blachman book ???
>> Has anybody done this, with similar product and could he?she kindly 
>> share the experience with suppliers of necesary software ???
>> Gracias a todos,

>I think you mean nb2tex.

>I hope this helps.


>Ian Collier
>Wolfram Research, Inc.
>tel:(217) 398-0700   fax:(217) 398-0747    ianc at
>Wolfram Research Home Page:

I'd like to add csnb2tex, also on MathSource ( find "Smith" ), which converts 
Mma notebooks to LaTeX.
It usually works better for me, because it uses fairly standard LaTeX files, 
without the rather unusual formatting nb2tex uses.

IMO nb2tex works only with a minimum of effort, if one wants to simply 
recreate the onescreen  Notebook, while csnb2tex is better for papers and 

Lars Hohmuth
Sektion NMR
Uni Ulm
<lars.hohmuth at>

  • Prev by Date: Re: Notebook==>>>TeX
  • Next by Date: [Q]: Reading Input
  • Previous by thread: Re: Notebook==>>>TeX
  • Next by thread: Comparison of Mathematica on Various Computers