Re: Mma on PowerMac 8100 vs. Mma on PowerMac 9500
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg4348] Re: Mma on PowerMac 8100 vs. Mma on PowerMac 9500
- From: mrjohns2 at uiuc.edu (Matthew Johnson)
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 01:00:33 -0400
- Organization: Student of Chemical Engineering at UIUC
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Are the macs set up the same?
memory, system, cache, inits, ram, etc, monitor bit depth?
matt
In article <4qqn7v$49m at dragonfly.wolfram.com>, Elias Saab
<mathes at esaab.math.missouri.edu> wrote:
>I executed the following cell on a PowerMac 8100/100
> and a PowerMac 9500/132
>
>It took 2.1 seconds on the 9500 and .46 second on the 8100.
>It is strange. Any idea why?
>Elias Saab
>
>In[178]:=
>Clear[x,y,surface,f]
>f[x_,y_]= x y;
>surface=ParametricPlot3D[
>{{x,y,0}, {x,y,f[x,y]}},{x,0,2},{y,0,1},
>ViewPoint->{2.5 ,1.7, 1.4},
>BoxRatios->{2,1,2},AxesLabel->{"x","y","z"}]//Timing
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Matthew Johnson
<mrjohns2 at uiuc.edu>
<http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/mrjohns2/>
==== [MESSAGE SEPARATOR] ====