MathGroup Archive 1997

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

How can I handle Operator Algebra ?

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg6482] How can I handle Operator Algebra ?
  • From: "Koichiro Yamaguchi" <tigercat at>
  • Date: Mon, 24 Mar 1997 21:38:28 -0500 (EST)
  • Organization: Media,Tokyo,JAPAN
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at


I am a beginner user of Mathematica version 2, so following question is
based on what I have done on Mathematica version 2.

I have a question about operator algebra. I think this question might be a
FAQ. But I could find no "answers for FAQ" of this newsgroup on my
newsserver, and also no explanation in the S.Wolfram's "Mathematica book
for version 3". So excuse me for asking this.

According to "Mathematica book" we can treat pure functions such as those
include some differential operators using "# and &" or "Function". Since it
seemed both of them gave same answers, only the results using "# and &" are
written below.

I tried to make an angular momentum operator as follows.     


And here I've got what I expected.

{-(z (D[#1, y] & )) + y (D[#1, z] & ), 
 z (D[#1, x] & ) - x (D[#1, z] & ), 
 -(y (D[#1, x] & )) + x (D[#1, y] & )}

Then I applied this operator to the length r.

rl=Sqrt[ DotProduct[r,r] ];
-(z (D[#1, y] & )) + y (D[#1, z] & )
rl // lx

But Mathematica did not accept multiple "&".
                                             2    2    2
(-(z (D[#1, y] & )) + y (D[#1, z] & ))[Sqrt[x  + y  + z ]]

In case of single "&", I could get a correct answer.
lx2= (-z D[#,y] + y D[#,z])&
-(z D[#1, y]) + y D[#1, z] & 
rl // lx2

However, if I use single "&" to define differential operator vector like


Mathematica rejects to recognize this as a vector. How should I I handle
Mathematica to do some elementary operator algebra like this ?

Thanks in advance for any comments and any answers. 

Koichiro Yamaguchi
E-mail: tigercat at

  • Prev by Date: Re: Numerical Left Eigenvectors
  • Next by Date: Re: Solving Underdamped Equation of motion
  • Previous by thread: Re: trouble integrating Bessel Functions
  • Next by thread: Re: How can I handle Operator Algebra ?