Re: Can I get ComplexExpand to really work?

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg14553] Re: Can I get ComplexExpand to really work?
• From: Hans Staugaard Nielsen <hsn at imf.au.dk>
• Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 03:07:26 -0500
• Organization: University of Aarhus, Department of Computer Science (DAIMI)
• References: <719f5p\$lc6@smc.vnet.net>
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

```Try this

Integrate[E^(I a
x^2),{x,-Infinity,Infinity},Assumptions->{Im[a]==0,a>0}]

Hans

Topher Cawlfield wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm having lots of problems getting Mathematica to make simplifying
> assumptions.  It always seems to want to produce horribly complex
> results because it assumes every variable is complex.  I wish I had
> better control of that.  In fact, it would also be nice if I could
> assure Mathematica that certain variables were positive as well.
>
> It sounds like the function ComplexExpand should do the trick, at least
> by assuming that variables are real unless otherwise specified.  But it
> doesn't really seem to work for me.  Here's an example:
>
> ComplexExpand[Integrate[E^(I a x^2), {x, -Infinity, Infinity}]]
>
> produces:
>
> If[Im[a] == 0, Sqrt[Pi/2] (1 + I Sign[a]) / (a^2)^(1/4), Integrate[E^(I
> a x^2), {x, -Infinity, Infinity}]]
>
> But if it really was assuming that 'a' was real, then it should know
> that Im[a] == 0!  If I could also tell it that 'a' was positive, the
>
> (1 + I) Sqrt[Pi/a]  or better still, Sqrt[2 Pi I / a]
>
> This is much simpler, and is the answer I want.
>
> Of course, my real application of this problem is much more complicated,
> but ultimately comes down to doing that integral (several times over).