MathGroup Archive 1999

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Mathematica as an Object

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg15708] Re: Mathematica as an Object
  • From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at>
  • Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 03:42:09 -0500 (EST)
  • Organization: Universitaet Leipzig
  • References: <7952gr$>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at

Hi David,

I don't know how You repeatly call Mathematica. Via MathLink it is no
problem to run the Mathematica kernel. Your program must act like a
(very special) frontend. I have no idea how Gauss interact with
programs but Your problem is not a Mathematica problem you must tell
Gauss to to launch the Mathematica kernel and to communicate with it.

But why using Gauss at all ? mathematica is more poverfull than Gauss
and if you need extra speed you can write a MathLink child that do all
the time consuming numerical tasks for you.


David Revelt wrote:
> Greetings,
> I have a function that I need to integrate over and over again.  The
> quickest way to do it is to integrate the function symbolically, and
> then plug in numbers for the parameters to evaluate it.  The solution
> to the symbolic integral is complicated consisting of a polynomial of
> over 100 terms.

snipp snapp

> Thanks for your help.
> David

  • Prev by Date: Displaying the intermediate steps of an evaluation
  • Next by Date: RE: RE: Help to clarify 'Map', 'Apply', and ' Thread'.
  • Previous by thread: Mathematica as an Object
  • Next by thread: Re: D vs. Derivative (2)