Re: Simplifying constants...bug?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg18559] Re: [mg18489] Simplifying constants...bug?
- From: calvitti at boes.ces.cwru.edu
- Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 02:18:50 -0400
- Organization: Case Western Reserve University
- References: <7m3l22$shp@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
here's some intersting behavior in 3.0:
(a + c*d)/(b + c*d) //. c*d -> -z
gives (as expected):
(a - z)/(b - z)
yet
(a + c*d)/(c*d) //. c*d -> -z
no longer simplifes the denominator:
(a+b-z)/(c*d)
anyone know why?
+------------------------------------------+
alan c
systems and control engineering
case western reserve university
calvitti at alpha.ces.cwru.edu
+------------------------------------------+
"Ersek, Ted R" <ErsekTR at navair.navy.mil> writes:
> Morten G. Dyndgaard wrote:
> -----------------------------
> I am working with some annoyingly long equations that I want to simplify
> by including one set of parameters in a constant (or function) A, and
> another in B and so on.
>
> You can easily do:
> A = b+c+d+e
>
> but what I want to do is the reverse:
> b+c+d+e = A
> -----------------------------
>
> This should help.
> In[1]:=
> expr=a+b+b1+c+c1+d+d1+e;
>
>
> In[2]:=
> expr/.a+b+c+d+e->A
>
> Out[2]=
> A+b1+c1+d1
>
>
> Regards,
> Ted Ersek
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Simplifying constants...bug?
- From: "Carl K.Woll" <carlw@fermi.phys.washington.edu>
- Re: Re: Simplifying constants...bug?
- From: "Wolf, Hartmut" <hwolf@debis.com>
- Re: Re: Simplifying constants...bug?
- From: "Kevin J. McCann" <kevinmccann@Home.com>
- Re: Re: Simplifying constants...bug?