       Re: Making a function dynamically define another conditional function...

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg21761] Re: [mg21733] Making a function dynamically define another conditional function...
• From: Hartmut Wolf <hwolf at debis.com>
• Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 22:56:42 -0500 (EST)
• Organization: debis Systemhaus
• References: <200001260845.DAA02315@smc.vnet.net>
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

```Paul Howland schrieb:
>
> How can I make a function dynamically define a conditional function?
>
> Given a list of arguments {{a,A}, {b,B}, ...} I want to write a function
> that will take these arguments, and generate a new function, f say,
> which is defined as (for example):
>     f[x_] := x+a /; x==A
>     f[x_] := x+b /; x==B
>     etc.
>
> So, the obvious solution is to define a function as follows:
>
> In := TestFn[data_List] := Module[{args},
>             ClearAll[f];
>             Do[
>                 args = data[[i]];
>                 f[x_] = x + args[] /; x==args[],
>                 {i, Length[data]}
>             ]]
>
> and call it using something like TestFn[{{1,2},{3,4},{5,6}}].
>
> But this doesn't work (see attached notebook) as it appears that
> Mathematica does not evaluate any part of the condition at the time of
> definition, so args[] remains unevaluated.  As a consequence, the
> resulting function definition is not properly defined.
>
> So, the obvious solution to this is to wrap Evaluate[] around the
> condition (i.e. define the function as f[x_] = x + args[] /;
> Evaluate[x == args[]].  And this appears to work.  If you do ?f, then
> you see a function comprising a number of conditional definitions.
> However, if you come to use the function, then it appears that
> Mathematica does not perform the condition test that appears in the
> definition!  It simply uses the first definition it finds.
>
> What is going on?!  How can I make this work?
>

Hello Paul,

in your definitions above you seem to define function values only for
certain discrete arguments, so I understand your function to be
equivalent with

f[A] = A+a
f[B] = B+b
etc.

For that just do

In:= Apply[(f[#2] = #1 + #2) &, {{1, 2}, {3, 4}, {5, 6}}, {1}];
In:= Information["f", LongForm -> False]
"Global`f"
f = 3

f = 7

f = 11

To make up another example, and to fully show the metaprogramming
method, e.g. if you want to have

ff[x_] := a /; x <= A
ff[x_] := b /; x <= B
etc.

In:= makeFun[f_Symbol, data_] :=
(Apply[(f[x_] := #1 /; x <= #2) &, data, {1}])

In(36]:= makeFun[ff, {{1, 2}, {3, 4}, {5, 6}}];

In:= Information["ff", LongForm -> False]
"Global`ff"
ff[x_] := 1 /; x <= 2

ff[x_] := 3 /; x <= 4

ff[x_] := 5 /; x <= 6

Regard that parentheses enclosing Set or SetDelayed in the defining
functions are neccessary.

Kind Regards,  Hartmut

```

• Prev by Date: RE: Making a function dynamically define another conditional function...
• Next by Date: Re: Making a function dynamically define another conditional function...
• Previous by thread: Making a function dynamically define another conditional function...
• Next by thread: Re: Making a function dynamically define another conditional function...