Re: With[{software=Mathematica}, Frustration]

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg24380] Re: [mg24308] With[{software=Mathematica}, Frustration]
• From: Andrzej Kozlowski <andrzej at bekkoame.ne.jp>
• Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 23:13:20 -0400 (EDT)
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

```You are right of course. It was just a case of a sudden attack of stupidity
("With", of course, only superficially resembles Module, it does not
"rename" the local constants and, moreover, c in the example wasn't even a
local constant!).
This should teach me to think before sending my replies (I hope)!

on 7/10/00 11:41 AM, Leszek Sczaniecki at lsczan at home.com wrote:

>
>
> Andrzej Kozlowski wrote:
>
>> on 00.7.7 1:11 PM, AES at siegman at stanford.edu wrote:
>>
>>> Pages 359-360 of The Mathematica Book says (admittedly, taken a little
>>> out of context),
>>>
>>> "You can think of  With  as a generalization of the /. operator. . ."
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> " With[{x=x0}, body]  works essentially like body /. x->x0 . . . "
>>>
>>> Great, looks neat, let's try it for evaluating expressions without
>>> permanently setting the variables in them:
>>>
>>> In[1]:= c = a b
>>>
>>> Out[1]= a b
>>>
>>> In[2]:= c
>>>
>>> Out[2]= a b
>>>
>>> In[10]:= c /. {a -> 2, b -> 3}
>>>
>>> Out[10]= 6
>>>
>>> In[3]:= With[{a = 2, b = 3}, c]
>>>
>>> Out[3]= a b
>>>
>>> *Not* what I was hoping for  . . .
>>>
>> The point here is that With works like Module: it renames the variables (a
>> way of localizing their meaning). Thus the c outside With and the one inside
>> are quite different.
>
> I am afraid that you are not quite right here. The true reason for the
> discussed
> behavior is, I believe, that Which has an attribute HoldAll.
>
> Best regards,
>
> --Leszek
>
>
>> What you  should have compared is
>>
>> In[13]:=
>> a*b /. {a -> 2, b -> 3}
>>
>> Out[13]=
>> 6
>>
>> In[14]:=
>> With[{a = 2, b = 3}, a*b]
>>
>> Out[14]=
>> 6
>>
>> Unfortunately the way the Mathematica book is written it is not a very good
>> idea to just read fragments of it, unless you are already pretty familiar
>> with the basic principles of the programming language. You'd do better to
>> read  some introductory text on Mathematica programming first.
>>
>> --
>> Andrzej Kozlowski
>> Toyama International University, JAPAN
>>
>> For Mathematica related links and resources try:
>> <http://www.sstreams.com/Mathematica/>
>

```

• Prev by Date: Re: define a new object or use the existing?
• Next by Date: Re: Division still cost more than multiplication?
• Previous by thread: Re: With[{software=Mathematica}, Frustration]
• Next by thread: Re: With[{software=Mathematica}, Frustration]