MathGroup Archive 2003

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: split a list

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg40639] Re: split a list
  • From: Bill Rowe <listuser at earthlink.net>
  • Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 02:06:23 -0400 (EDT)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

On 4/10/03 at 3:44 AM, majort at cox-internet.com (Dr Bob) wrote:

>Your solution (the same as Jens-Peer Kuska's) IS simpler and clearer
>(though clarity is in the eye of the beholder!) 

Agreed

>-- but my timing comparisons disagree with yours.  Perhaps my
>environment is different (WinXP, 1024MB Ram, 2.2 GHz P4, Mathematica
>4.2.1). 

Yes, my enviroment is different (MacOS X, 1024MB Ram, 800 MHz G4, Mathematica 4.2.1). With a different environment it isn't surprising the actual times are different. But I would have thought the time rankings would be the same given the same version of Mathematica. It seems interesting this doesn't seem to be the case. Clearly a case of user beware.

In any case, the timing differences between the two methods is quite small and unlikely to be noticed except for extreme cases.


  • Prev by Date: Re: Adding elements of a matrix
  • Next by Date: Re: Adding elements of a matrix
  • Previous by thread: Re: split a list
  • Next by thread: Re: split a list