MathGroup Archive 2003

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: Opinions about the "Oneliners"

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg40692] Re: [mg40671] Re: Opinions about the "Oneliners"
  • From: "Y.A.Tesiram" <yas at pcomm.hfi.unimelb.edu.au>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 04:00:28 -0400 (EDT)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

> >Do, While, and For are often the least efficient (slowest) way to do things
> >in terms of execution time.  We see this time after time in our function
> >wars.
>
>
>
> Isn't this just because Mathematica was optimized for functional
> programming.  Couldn't it be optimized for procedural as well (like
> every C compiler) ?

It already is. The function Compile is used to remove the overhead that
exists in an "intepreted on the fly" language like Mathematica's. Same
goes for Compile's equivalents in such languages as Lisp and Perl.

Yas



  • Prev by Date: Re: Newbie Question: Solving for x?
  • Next by Date: Re: Apparent bug in 4.2 version DSolve ?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Opinions about the "Oneliners"
  • Next by thread: AW: Need a nice way to do this