MathGroup Archive 2003

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: shadow-proofing a package

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg42793] Re: [mg42774] Re: shadow-proofing a package
  • From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>
  • Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 04:33:00 -0400 (EDT)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

On Friday, July 25, 2003, at 11:08 AM, Bill Rowe wrote:

> In fact, this is very easy to accomplish with consistent naming 
> conventions. If all of the exported function names begin with upper 
> case consistent with Mathematica's internal naming conventions and you 
> consistently use lower case for working notebooks, there will clearly 
> be no conflict. In that case, the first approach Selwyn Hollis 
> mentioned would work fine.

There can still be a conflict with another package following the same 
convention. In fact such conflicts arise even between Mathematica's 
Standard packages, e.g. try loading:

<<Graphics`Polyhedra`

and

<<DiscreteMath`Combinatorica`


Andrzej Kozlowski

Yokohama, Japan
http://www.mimuw.edu.pl/~akoz/
http://platon.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp/andrzej/


  • Prev by Date: Re: DOUBLE COLUMN TEXT CELL
  • Next by Date: Re: v5 FrontEnd problem on Linux
  • Previous by thread: Re: shadow-proofing a package
  • Next by thread: Mathematica and RedHat 9