       Re: A problem about numerical precision

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg52633] Re: A problem about numerical precision
• From: Peter Pein <petsie at arcor.de>
• Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 02:08:10 -0500 (EST)
• References: <cos0o0\$dhf\$1@smc.vnet.net>
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

```Guofeng Zhang wrote:

> Hi,
>   I met one problem when I do some iteration: By increasing numerical
> precision, the results are so different from the original one!  I
> don't know what went wrong, and hope to get some answers.
>
> The code is
>
> delta = 1/100;
> a = 9/10;
> b = -3*1.4142135623730950/10;
> A = { {1,0}, {b,a} };
> B= { {-1,1}, {-b,b} };
>
> f[v_,x_] := If[ Abs[ (10^20)*v-(10^20)*x]>(10^20)*delta, 1, 0 ];
>
> M = 3000;
> it = Table[0, {i,M}, {j,2} ];
> it[  ] = { -delta/2, (a+b)*(-delta/2) };
>
> For[ i=1, i<M, it[ [i+1]]  = A.it[[i]]+f[ it[ [i,1] ], it[ [i,2] ]
> ]*B.it[ [i] ]; i++ ];
> temp = Take[it, -1000];
>
> ListPlot[ temp ];
>
> By evaluating this, I got an oscillating orbit. I got the same using
> another program. However, if I increase the numerical precision by
> using
> b = -3*1.4142135623730950``200/10;
> to substitute the original b, the trajectory would converge to a fixed
> point instead of  wandering around!
>
> I don't know why. I am hoping for suggestions. Thanks a lot.
>
> Guofeng
>
MatrixNorm[A]>1 and approximations are represented by a finite number of
digits. So what did you expect?

b.t.w.: setting the precision to a higher value will give your
oscillating orbit again:

delta = 1/100;
a = 9/10;
b = -3*Sqrt[2.`2000]/10;
A = {{1, 0}, {b, a}};
B = {{-1, 1}, {-b, b}};
m = 1000;
temp = Take[NestList[A . #1 + If[Abs[Subtract @@ #1] > delta, B . #1, 0]
& , -{(delta/2), 1/2*(a + b)*delta}, 3*m], -m];
ListPlot[temp, PlotRange -> All, PlotStyle -> AbsolutePointSize[0.001]];

--
Peter Pein
10245 Berlin

```

• Prev by Date: Re: A problem of numerical precision
• Next by Date: Re: Complex Analysis using Mathematica