Re: Re: Intersection of two surfaces in 3D

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg52912] Re: [mg52863] Re: [mg52822] Intersection of two surfaces in 3D*From*: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>*Date*: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 03:41:35 -0500 (EST)*References*: <200412141059.FAA24571@smc.vnet.net> <200412150926.EAA10631@smc.vnet.net> <opsi2plik4iz9bcq@monster.ma.dl.cox.net>*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Well, look at the bright side: if you can't see the curve, it probably means that it lies on the surface, which is after all what you wanted to check ;-) This is may also be platform dependent, on the Mac I seem to see the curves quite clearly. But of course this is the kind of thig where Jens' MathGL3d shines. The only problem is that I don't think it works very well on the Mac. Andrzej On 16 Dec 2004, at 08:45, DrBob wrote: >>> We simply turn on RealTime graphics with > << RealTime3D` >>> Now look at > Show[g1, pp1] >>> you can clearly see the curve g1 lying on the surface pp1 (defined by > you). > > Uh, no, g1 is almost completely invisible -- at my desk, anyway. > (WinXP, Mathematica 5.1) At some angles I can see parts of g1, but not clearly > at all. > > To the extent one CAN pick out the lines, these charts are useful > (with RealTime3D` loaded): > > DisplayTogether[ParametricPlot3D[{x1, y1, z1}, {t1, 0, 2 Pi}, {t2, > 0, 1}, PolygonIntersections -> False], ParametricPlot3D[{ > x2, y2, z2}, {s1, 0, 2 Pi}, {s2, 0, 4}], > g1]; > > DisplayTogether[ParametricPlot3D[{x1, y1, z1}, {t1, 0, 2 Pi}, {t2, > 0, 3}, PolygonIntersections -> False], ParametricPlot3D[{ > x2, y2, z2}, {s1, 0, 2 Pi}, {s2, 0, 5}], > g2]; > > I can discern bits of g1 and g2 (I think) in the intersections of the > surfaces. > > I found no way to make the lines more visible. > > Bobby > > On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 04:26:25 -0500 (EST), Andrzej Kozlowski > <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On 14 Dec 2004, at 19:59, Narasimham wrote: >> >>> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) >>> Pro* >>> There are threads currently on sci.math on this topic. How do we >>> find >>> space intersection curve of two parameterized surfaces? One needs to >>> solve for two unknown functions f1(t1,t2)=0 and f2(s1,s2)=0 to print >>> out/output coordinates of intersection. I do believe it is within the >>> capability of Mathematica, at least when surfaces are algebraically >>> generatable. An example/approach considered is: >>> >>> Clear[x,y,z,t1,t2,s1,s2]; >>> x1=4*t2* Cos[t1]; y1=4Sin[t1]; z1=3t2; >>> x2=s2 Sin[s1];y2=s2 Cos[s1];z2=(s2^2/4); >>> pp1=ParametricPlot3D[{x1,y1,z1},{t1,0,2 Pi},{t2,0,1}]; >>> pp2=ParametricPlot3D[{x2,y2,z2},{s1,0,2 Pi},{s2,0,4}]; >>> Show[pp1,pp2]; >>> S1={x-x1,y-y1,z-z1}; S2={x-x2,y-y2,z-z2}; >>> NSolve[Join[S1,S2],{x,y,z},{t1,t2,s1,s2}]; >>> >>> >> >> In fact in principle Mathematica can fully solve this problem without >> the need for numerical methods. >> >> f = GroebnerBasis[{x - 4*t*Cos[s], y - 4*Sin[s], z - 3*t, Sin[s]^2 + >> Cos[s]^2 - 1}, {x, y, z}, {t, Sin[s], Cos[s]}] >> >> {9*x^2 - 16*z^2 + y^2*z^2} >> >> So the space of zeros of the first equation is a subset of the space >> of >> solutions of the Cartesian equation: >> >> 9*x^2 - 16*z^2 + y^2*z^2==0 >> >> >> (They may actually be the same, I have not tried to check.) >> >> >> g = GroebnerBasis[{x - t*Sin[s], y - t*Cos[s], z - t^2/4, Sin[s]^2 + >> Cos[s]^2 - 1}, {x, y, z}, {t, Sin[s], Cos[s]}] >> >> >> {x^2 + y^2 - 4*z} >> >> So again all points on the surface satisfy >> >> x^2 + y^2 - 4*z==0 >> >> >> Let's now try to find the solutions of this >> >> >> >> sols=Reduce[Join[f, g] == 0, {x, y}, Reals] >> >> >> (0 <= z <= 9/4 && ((x == -Sqrt[(-16*z^2 + 4*z^3)/(-9 + z^2)] && (y == >> -Sqrt[-x^2 + 4*z] || y == Sqrt[-x^2 + 4*z])) || >> (x == Sqrt[(-16*z^2 + 4*z^3)/(-9 + z^2)] && (y == -Sqrt[-x^2 + >> 4*z] >> || y == Sqrt[-x^2 + 4*z])))) || >> (z >= 4 && ((x == -Sqrt[(-16*z^2 + 4*z^3)/(-9 + z^2)] && (y == >> -Sqrt[-x^2 + 4*z] || y == Sqrt[-x^2 + 4*z])) || >> (x == Sqrt[(-16*z^2 + 4*z^3)/(-9 + z^2)] && (y == -Sqrt[-x^2 + >> 4*z] >> || y == Sqrt[-x^2 + 4*z])))) >> >> >> We can think of these answers as representing several parametric >> curves >> in space. The interesection points of the original surfaces should be >> contained among them. Unfortunately it takes a bit of work to get it >> all into the right form. We want to express x and y in terms of z and >> using z as the parameter (using only the real values of z returned by >> Reduce) plot the curves. Note that there seem to be two pieces, for >> 0<z<9/4 and for z>4. One can plot them as follows: >> >> >> g1=ParametricPlot3D[Evaluate[{x, y, z} /. Solve[{x == -Sqrt[(-16*z^2 + >> 4*z^3)/(-9 + z^2)], y == -Sqrt[-x^2 + 4*z]}, {x, y}]], {z, 0, 9/4}] >> >> and >> >> >> g2=ParametricPlot3D[Evaluate[{x, y, z} /. Solve[{x == -Sqrt[(-16*z^2 + >> 4*z^3)/(-9 + z^2)], y == -Sqrt[-x^2 + 4*z]}, {x, y}]], {z, 4, 8}] >> >> In general you expect them to be a superset of the intersection curve. >> We can try to check this graphically. Doing so is a beautiful >> application of Mathematica's interactive graphics. >> >> We simply turn on RealTime graphics with >> >> << RealTime3D` >> >> Now look at >> >> Show[g1, pp1] >> >> you can clearly see the curve g1 lying on the surface pp1 (defined by >> you). >> >> Now do the same thing with pp2: >> >> Show[g1, pp2] >> >> again by rotating the graphic into a suitable position we can see >> clearly that the curve also lies on pp2. >> >> Replacing g1 by g2 is slightly less convincing. We need to change the >> parameters in both surface plots because the curve is actually in a >> different region. But by changing the plots of the surfaces to >> >> pp1 = ParametricPlot3D[{x1, y1, z1}, {t1, 0, 2 Pi}, {t2, 0, 3}]; >> pp2 = ParametricPlot3D[{x2, y2, z2}, {s1, 0, 2 Pi}, {s2, 0, 10}]; >> >> we see that this curve also lies on both surfaces. So the problem >> seems >> to have been solved. >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > DrBob at bigfoot.com > www.eclecticdreams.net >

**References**:**Intersection of two surfaces in 3D***From:*"Narasimham" <mathma18@hotmail.com>

**Re: Intersection of two surfaces in 3D***From:*Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl>

**Re: Integrate in version 5.1**

**Re: Mathematica 5.0 on Mandrake 10.1?**

**Re: Re: Intersection of two surfaces in 3D**

**Need your help to solve a PDE.**