Re: Apart's loss of functionality in 5.1
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg52980] Re: [mg52949] Apart's loss of functionality in 5.1
- From: DrBob <drbob at bigfoot.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 04:00:14 -0500 (EST)
- References: <200412171020.FAA16147@smc.vnet.net>
- Reply-to: drbob at bigfoot.com
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Try the "Copy as InputForm" palette: http://eclecticdreams.net/DrBob/copy_as_inputform.htm Bobby On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 05:20:07 -0500 (EST), Dr. G <sag at math.byu.edu> wrote: > I have an example rational function which is succesfully separated > into fundamental, "degree-2" components via the 4.1 Apart function, > but which is not with 5.1's Apart operation. If someone will let > me know how to post a notebook's contents, I will demonstrate the > example. > > > > -- DrBob at bigfoot.com www.eclecticdreams.net
- References:
- Apart's loss of functionality in 5.1
- From: "Dr. G" <sag@math.byu.edu>
- Apart's loss of functionality in 5.1