MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: problem with physical constants (bug?)

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg59249] Re: problem with physical constants (bug?)
  • From: Jean-Marc Gulliet <jeanmarc.gulliet at gmail.com>
  • Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 01:19:52 -0400 (EDT)
  • Organization: The Open University, Milton Keynes, U.K.
  • References: <dcmur3$go2$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Chris Chiasson wrote:
> Dear MathGroup,
> The electric constant is 1/(c^2*magnetic constant). The speed of light
> is exact. The magnetic constant is exact. Thus, the electric constant
> is exact. In Miscellaneous`PhysicalConstants`, VacuumPermittivity is
> not exact. It should be exactly equal to
> 1/(SpeedOfLight^2*VacuumPermeability).

Hi Chris,

No bug here: both quantities are equal except that 
1/(SpeedOfLight^2*VacuumPermeability) is expressed in exact arithmetic 
(in the sense of Mathematica; that is infinite precision numbers: look 
at the Pi symbol in the definition of VacuumPermeability) whereas 
VacuumPermittivity is expressed as machine size precision number. So we 
have:

In[1]:=
Needs["Miscellaneous`PhysicalConstants`"]

In[2]:=
VacuumPermittivity

Out[2]=
(8.854187817*^-12*Ampere*Second)/(Meter*Volt)

In[3]:=
1/(SpeedOfLight^2*VacuumPermeability)

Out[3]=
(625000*Ampere*Second)/(22468879468420441*Meter*Pi*Volt)

In[4]:=
N[%]

Out[4]=
(8.85418781762039*^-12*Ampere*Second)/(Meter*Volt)

Hope this helps,
/J.M.


  • Prev by Date: Re: Manipulating a matrix
  • Next by Date: Re: Mathematical link between two or more numbers
  • Previous by thread: Re: problem with physical constants (bug?)
  • Next by thread: Experimental`ImpliesQ, Help me understand it.