Re: Pure Function within a pure function
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg59329] Re: Pure Function within a pure function
- From: Bill Rowe <readnewsciv at earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 01:23:23 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
On 8/4/05 at 2:07 AM, ggroup at sarj.ca wrote:
>I'm wondering if it is possible to define a pure function within a
>function, and if so, what syntax should I be using?
I don't have an answer to the question above. However,
>I have some data that I want to filter, say:
>rawdata[[1]]=
>time1 pt1-1 pt1-2 pt1-3
>time2 pt2-1 pt2-2 pt2-3
>time3 aborted!
>rawdata[[2]]=
>time1 pta-1 pta-2 pta-3
>time2 aborted!
>I have a list of such data sets, and I want to apply a filter to
>remove the "aborted" lines to each set. With a table command, this
>is fairly easy:
>data = Table[
>Select[rawdata[[i]],Length[#]==4&], {i,Length[rawdata]}
>]
>For readability (and lets face it, for pure asthetic value), I was
>hoping to convert this to a function which I could map onto my
>rawdata array.
How about using
DeleteCases[#, {___, aborted!}] & /@ rawdata
--
To reply via email subtract one hundred and four