MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Units, simplification

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg59626] Re: Units, simplification
  • From: Bill Rowe <readnewsciv at earthlink.net>
  • Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 04:38:11 -0400 (EDT)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

On 8/13/05 at 3:26 AM, not_valid at w.pl (KaeL) wrote:

>Great THX, it really works and this is a straightforward solution
>for me, too. One question: how did you know the $ToFundamental
>parameter (option?)? Did you simply read units.m or is there maybe
>a documentation I am not aware of?

I opened the Units.m package in a text editor to determine how to best solve this problem. My original intent was to see how to best to create my own function by reviewing how this was done in the Units.m package. It was then I discovered $ToFundamental and this particular solution.

--
To reply via email subtract one hundred and four


  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: Units, simplification
  • Next by Date: Re: Defining functions using the output of an other function
  • Previous by thread: Re: Units, simplification
  • Next by thread: Re: Units, simplification