MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Distribution and Integral

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg59882] Re: Distribution and Integral
  • From: Peter Pein <petsie at dordos.net>
  • Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 06:32:23 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <deeo66$2vq$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

ms_usenet at gmx.de schrieb:
> Hello,
> 
> to apply further rules on simpler integrals (rules for the integration
> by parts), I would like to distribute the integral over its summands.
> This works if it is an integral alone, but doesn't if there is a factor
> (because the head is Integrate in the first, and Times in the latter
> case?):
> 
> \!\(Distribute[
>     t \(\[Integral]\_x1\%x2\((f[x] +
>               g[x])\) \[DifferentialD]x\)]\[IndentingNewLine]
>   Distribute[\[Integral]\_x1\%x2\((f[x] + g[x])\) \[DifferentialD]x]\)
> 
> Out[695]=
> \!\(t\ \(\[Integral]\_x1\%x2\((f[x] + g[x])\) \[DifferentialD]x\)\)
> Out[696]=
> \!\(\[Integral]\_x1\%x2 f[x] \[DifferentialD]x + \[Integral]\_x1\%x2 g[
>           x] \[DifferentialD]x\)
> 
> How could I get the distribution in the latter case? Because f and g
> can have variable structure, I haven't found a simple rule with
> patterns. A hint to simplify the original problem, integration by
> parts, would be appreciated too!
> 
> Best Regards,
> Martin
> 
Hallo Martin,

I guess this _is_ a simple solution using patterns:

In[1]:=
t*Integrate[f[x] + g[x], {x, x1, x2}] /. i_Integrate :> Distribute[i]
Out[1]=
t*(Integrate[f[x], {x, x1, x2}] + Integrate[g[x], {x, x1, x2}])


-- 
Peter Pein, Berlin
GnuPG Key ID: 0xA34C5A82
http://people.freenet.de/Peter_Berlin/


  • Prev by Date: Re: List Replace Problems
  • Next by Date: Re: a question about intersection curve.
  • Previous by thread: Distribution and Integral
  • Next by thread: Re: Distribution and Integral