MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: mathematica to word

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg64949] Re: mathematica to word
  • From: Mike <m.HoneychurcNOSPAMh at>
  • Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 01:00:55 -0500 (EST)
  • Organization: University of Queensland
  • References: <due7ou$9qq$> <dujsm7$9bf$>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at

Not so long ago in this newsgroup Paul Abbott provided a link to some
examples of reports and dissertations (from his department?) written
entirely in Mathematica. It would certainly be the preferred option unless
their was a specific requirement to prepare it in Word. If you do a quick
search you should be able to find that link or if Paul reads this he may
provide it again.



On 7/3/06 10:01 PM, in article dujsm7$9bf$1 at, "Mark Westwood"
<markc.westwood at> wrote:

> I used Mathematica to write a short dissertation, c60 pages of text
> with graphics, and found this to be far easier than wrestling graphics
> and tables out of Mathematica and into Word.  So I concur with the
> earlier posters who recommend that you follow the pure Mathematica
> route.
> I did find Mathematica a bit tricky when it came to table of contents
> and similar automatic text, but probably not much more so than Word.
> Regards
> Mark Westwood

  • Prev by Date: Re: Bizarre results with TreePlot
  • Next by Date: Re: Extract values and multilpicities from list
  • Previous by thread: Re: mathematica to word
  • Next by thread: Re: mathematica to word