Re: Re: Variables Within Homemade Functions
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg69651] Re: [mg69598] Re: Variables Within Homemade Functions
- From: Daniel Lichtblau <danl at wolfram.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 05:45:20 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <eegb90$lm$1@smc.vnet.net> <200609171057.GAA28743@smc.vnet.net>
> [...] > ***BTW, Block can have amazing results. For example > > > Integrate[1/x, {x, -1, 2}] > 1 > Integrate::idiv: Integral of - does not converge on {-1, 2}. More... > x > > Integrate[x^(-1), {x, -1, 2}] > > ***But > > Block[{Message},Integrate[1/x,{x,-1,2}]] > Infinity > > [...] There is a smallish bug in Integrate that is behind this. Clearly it should be unevaluated (that is, Infinity is quite incorrect). That said, I view this example as user error. To see this we start with a mundane use of Check. In[9]:= Check[ee=Simplify[aa,False],fubar,Simplify::fas] Simplify::fas: Warning: One or more assumptions evaluated to False. Out[9]= fubar If you block Message then you effectively cripple Check. We see below that we do not get the Check'd result but rather the default. In[10]:= Block[{Message}, Check[ee=Simplify[aa,False],fubar,Simplify::fas]] Out[10]= aa Integrate and perhaps other functions will use things like Check, and expect them to work in their default manner. By the way, if you want to be free of messages printing, this can be done in a way that does not at the same time trach Check: In[11]:= Block[{$Messages}, Check[ee=Simplify[aa,False],fubar,Simplify::fas]] Out[11]= fubar In[12]:= Block[{$Messages}, Integrate[1/x,{x,-1,2}]] 1 Out[12]= Integrate[-, {x, -1, 2}] x Here we get the correct results without messages. Moral: Don't Block[] built in functionality without a compelling reason to do so. (Put differently, be prepared to accept consequences of not knowing what you are doing.) Daniel Lichtblau Wolfram Research
- References:
- Re: Variables Within Homemade Functions
- From: dimmechan@yahoo.com
- Re: Variables Within Homemade Functions