MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: Re: Why is the negative root?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg69784] Re: [mg69732] Re: [mg69656] Re: Why is the negative root?
  • From: János <janos.lobb at yale.edu>
  • Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 04:44:09 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <200609220503.BAA16334@smc.vnet.net>

On Sep 21, 2006, at 1:34 AM, Andrzej Kozlowski wrote:

>
> On 20 Sep 2006, at 20:21, Andrzej Kozlowski wrote:
>
>> The key word is "root isolation".
>
> As has been, quite rightly, pointed out that's clearly two words.
> Since I think I can still count to 2 without help from Mathematica
> (but clearly not much more since recently I got completely stuck
> trying to add a 10% tip to a restaurant bill

Hmm...  10%...  That is not bad.  In the States it is minimum 15%.   
Can you imagine how harder our brain must work ?  Now I know why did  
I  /subconsciously/  avoid restaurants in recent years :)

János


-----------------------------------------
With dark magic, evil-looking sacrificial knives and scantily clad  
virgins under pale moonlight.

http://www.cpan.org/misc/cpan-faq.html#What_is_CPAN


  • Prev by Date: Re: Suggestions for translating a Do[] loop ...
  • Next by Date: Table command strange output when 'i' over 16
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: Why is the negative root?
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: Re: Why is the negative root?