RE: Mathematica to .NET compiler
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg79325] RE: Mathematica to .NET compiler
- From: Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:56:56 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200707200725.DAA24728@smc.vnet.net> <f7sflm$rs0$1@smc.vnet.net>
David Annetts wrote: > What would be the advantages of such a compiler over (say) MathF90 (or > MathC++ if you're so inclined) at http://www.mathcore.com/ ? The MathCore guys kindly sent me a link to the document describing the subset that they support: http://www.mathcore.com/resources/documents/mathcodec++_subset.pdf They don't support: Pattern matching Arbitrary-precision arithmetic Symbolic manipulation Negative array indexing Strings IO Efficient array resizing Expressions Most of these are easy to implement if you target a higher-level language than C++. -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy OCaml for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/?usenet
- References:
- Mathematica to .NET compiler
- From: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
- Mathematica to .NET compiler