Re: Re: Re: Locator question
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg79526] Re: [mg79452] Re: [mg79433] Re: Locator question
- From: DrMajorBob <drmajorbob at bigfoot.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 05:40:19 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <f86r55$pc7$1@smc.vnet.net> <200707250930.FAA26363@smc.vnet.net> <f89pve$5jn$1@smc.vnet.net> <200707261030.GAA09683@smc.vnet.net> <12053562.1185538119591.JavaMail.root@m35> <op.tv4rezijqu6oor@monster.gateway.2wire.net> <8266975.1185567612261.JavaMail.root@m35>
- Reply-to: drmajorbob at bigfoot.com
I didn't know Locators existed at ALL, before version 6.
Yet this code works in v 5.0.1 and NOT in v 6???
(I have continually updated WinXP and Mathematica 6.0.1.)
Bobby
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:15:41 -0500, Murray Eisenberg
<murray at math.umass.edu> wrote:
> Under Windows XP with Mathematica 5.0.1, and with the version of
> trackPointOnPlot nearest the top of my posting, I see only one locator!
>
> DrMajorBob wrote:
>> That code gives me two locators, neither of them on the curve. One
>> can't be "grabbed", but it moves when I move the other one. If I move
>> the second locator to the curve, the other also moves to the curve, at
>> another point (but sometimes beyond the left limit of the plot).
>> Bizarro!
>> Am I the only one seeing this?
>> Bobby
>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:48:07 -0500, Murray Eisenberg
>> <murray at math.umass.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Very nice! An observation and a question:
>>>
>>> 1. Probably it would be more reasonable that the third, optional,
>>> argument be not an {x,y} point, but instead the x-coordinate of that
>>> point, since the point is supposed to be on the graph anyway. The
>>> modification for that is trivial:
>>>
>>> trackPointOnPlot[f_, {a_, b_}, strt_: Automatic] :=
>>> Module[{start = strt /. Automatic -> a},
>>> DynamicModule[{p = {start, f[start]}},
>>> Column[{LocatorPane[Dynamic[p, (p = {First@#, f[First@#]})
>>> &],
>>> Plot[f[x], {x, a, b}]], Dynamic[p]}]]]
>>>
>>> 2. Where/how did you discover the "trick" of using Automatic as a
>>> default value for an argument? I don't recall seeing that before.
>>>
>>> Albert wrote:
>>>> ...The following is my attempt to solve your issue, it only uses one
>>>> definition, but introduces some extra code...
>>>>
>>>> trackPointOnPlot[f_, {a_, b_}, strt_: Automatic] :=
>>>> Module[{start = strt /. Automatic -> {a, f[a]}},
>>>> DynamicModule[{p = start},
>>>> Column[{LocatorPane[Dynamic[p, (p = {First@#, f[First@#]}) &],
>>>> Plot[f[x], {x, a, b}]], Dynamic[p]}]]
>>>> ]
>>>
>>> Of course, per your suggestion, a simpler way but now using only the
>>> x-coordinate as third, optional, argument is:
>>>
>>> trackPointOnPlot[f_, {a_, b_}, start_] :=
>>> DynamicModule[{p = {start, f[start]}},
>>> Column[{LocatorPane[Dynamic[p, (p = {First@#, f[First@#]})
>>> &],
>>> Plot[f[x], {x, a, b}]], Dynamic[p]}]]
>>>
>>> trackPointOnPlot[f_, {a_, b_}] := trackPointOnPlot[f, {a, b}, a]
>>>
>>
>
--
DrMajorBob at bigfoot.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Locator question
- From: Murray Eisenberg <murray@math.umass.edu>
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Locator question
- References:
- Re: Locator question
- From: Albert <awnl@arcor.net>
- Re: Locator question
- From: Albert <awnl@arcor.net>
- Re: Locator question