MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Normal for Limit

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg74283] Re: Normal for Limit
  • From: "Sebastian Meznaric" <meznaric at gmail.com>
  • Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:53:30 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <etcnik$9c3$1@smc.vnet.net>

On Mar 15, 5:15 pm, Mr Ajit Sen <senr... at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Dear MathGroup,
>
>   I refer to Andrzej Kozlowski's post  where
>   he recommended the use of Series to find limits, and
>   then used Normal with Landau symbols (big O).
>
>   I therefore deduced (incorrectly ?) that
>
>        Limit[f[x],x->p] === Normal[f[x]+ O[x,p]],
>
>   except when p is a "pole".
>
>   So, is there a work around, still using Normal, to
>   obtain +/- Infinity?
>
>   My guess is that we might have to modify the args
>   of the O.  But I might be wrong.
>
>   I'd be grateful for any help.
>
>   Thanks a lot in advance.
>
>   Ajit Sen.
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre.http://uk.security.yahoo.com

Can you post the function you're using?



  • Prev by Date: Re: Mathematica 4.0
  • Next by Date: How to choose real positive solutions?
  • Previous by thread: Normal for Limit
  • Next by thread: Re:Re: Normal for Limit