Re: v.6 RevolutionPlot3D
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg75896] Re: [mg75852] v.6 RevolutionPlot3D
- From: DrMajorBob <drmajorbob at bigfoot.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 05:38:36 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <26790717.1178958081186.JavaMail.root@m35>
- Reply-to: drmajorbob at bigfoot.com
See if the ViewVertical option (in combination with AxesLabel) helps any.
RevolutionPlot3D[{t, t^2}, {t, 0, 2}, AxesLabel -> {x, y, z},
Ticks -> None, ViewVertical -> {1, 0, 0}]
or
RevolutionPlot3D[{t, t^2}, {t, 0, 2}, AxesLabel -> {z, x, y},
Ticks -> None, ViewVertical -> {1, 0, 0}]
et cetera.
Bobby
On Sat, 12 May 2007 02:00:04 -0500, Helen Read <read at math.uvm.edu> wrote:
> We just got 6.0 on our site license, and I installed on my computer(s)
> yesterday.
>
> I see that SurfaceOfRevolution (which was in an add on package) has been
> replaced by RevolutionPlot3D. Sounds great, except that RevolutionPlot3D
> only revolves around the vertical axis. We (my calculus students) used
> the old SurfaceOfRevolution all the time for visualizing surfaces of
> revolution for computing volume and surface area, and we need to be able
> to revolve around both the vertical axis and the horizontal axis. This
> was a simple matter of setting RevolutionAxis->{0,0,1} or
> RevolutionAxis->{1,0,0} respectively. Now, I can write a function for
> revolving around the horizontal axis and provide it to the students, but
> I can already foresee the confusion it will cause when they can use a
> built-in function for revolving in one direction, and have to do it a
> different way to revolve in the other direction.
>
> --
> Helen Read
> University of Vermont
>
>
--
DrMajorBob at bigfoot.com