Re: Re: Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg76494] Re: [mg76446] Re: [mg76231] Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
- From: "Chris Chiasson" <chris at chiasson.name>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 05:18:27 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200705110933.FAA06232@smc.vnet.net> <f21g6n$7hg$1@smc.vnet.net>
If the error only appears during rendering, it could possibly be taken care of with a DownValue for Rectangle. On 5/22/07, Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl> wrote: > > On 18 May 2007, at 19:10, rip pelletier wrote: > > > as i said in another post, i have a found a much easier replacement > > ("GraphicsGrid ") for that use of Rectangle, so i no longer care much > > about the error message i get. > > > > if someone posts a working example, i'll eagerly give it a try, but > > i'm > > not going to try to construct one. > > > > vale, > > I now got official Mathematica 6.0 for Mac OS X and can confirm that > using a graphic object as third argument to Rectangle no longer > works. As I suspected, that must have been due to a last minute > change (it worked in the last pre-Release version). Of course it no > longer matters (except as another non-compatibility issue) but I > thought I should correct my earlier misleading statement. > It would be mildly interesting to know the reasons for this change, > since WRI does not normally introduce incompatibilities for no > reason. Perhaps the old functionality was actually causing some > problems. > > Andrzej Kozlowski > > -- http://chris.chiasson.name/
- References:
- v. 6, third argument to rectangle
- From: rip pelletier <bitbucket@comcast.net>
- v. 6, third argument to rectangle