Re: NIntegrate Problem
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg94633] Re: NIntegrate Problem
- From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:21:41 -0500 (EST)
- Organization: Uni Leipzig
- References: <giapeb$9e9$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Reply-to: kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de
Hi,
and
W[t_?NumericQ, v_?NumericQ] :=
Abs[NIntegrate[
E^(-((u^2 + u v)/8.)) Sinc[(u + v)/
2.] E^(-I (t + 0.5) u), {u, -5., 5.}]]^2
G2[t_?NumericQ] := NIntegrate[E^(-(v^2/8)) W[t, v], {v, -7., 7.}]
work fine with Mathematica 6.0 and 7.0
Regards
Jens
Kevin J. McCann wrote:
> I have the following double integral
>
> W[t_, v_] :=
> Abs[NIntegrate[
> E^(-((u^2 + u v)/8.))
> Sinc[(u + v)/2.] E^(-I (t + 0.5) u) , {u, -5., 5.}]]^2
> G2[t_] := NIntegrate[E^(-(v^2/8)) W[t, v], {v, -7., 7.}]
>
> G2[0.0]
>
> The last part produces this rather strange output, considering that the
> Abs[]^2 should not give out complex numbers.
>
> NIntegrate::inumr: The integrand E^(-0.5 I u-0.125 (<<1>>+<<1>>))
> Sinc[0.5 (u+v)] has evaluated to non-numerical values for all sampling
> points in the region with boundaries {{-5.,5.}}.
>
> NIntegrate::inumr: The integrand E^(-0.5 I u-0.125 (<<1>>-<<1>>))
> Sinc[0.5 (u-v)] has evaluated to non-numerical values for all sampling
> points in the region with boundaries {{-5.,5.}}.
>
> General::stop: "\!\(\*
> StyleBox[\"\\\"Further output of \\\"\", \"MT\"]\)\!\(\* StyleBox[
> RowBox[{\"NIntegrate\", \"::\", \"\\\"inumr\\\"\"}], \"MT\"]\)\!\(\*
> StyleBox[\"\\\" will be suppressed during this calculation.\\\"\",
> \"MT\"]\) "
>
> 56.8889
>
> One other interesting thing is that after all the complaining, it does
> produce an answer. Evaluate of the function W[t,v] above only produces
> real numbers. In addition, the integration is very slow. I got around
> the problem by building a Table of W, using Interpolation, and then
> integrating that - very fast, and no problems.
>
> Any ideas why I would get the above complaints?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin
>