Re: Solve vs Reduce
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg94657] Re: [mg94627] Solve vs Reduce
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:23:33 -0500 (EST)
- References: <200812181220.HAA00318@smc.vnet.net>
On 18 Dec 2008, at 21:20, Jaccard Florian wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have the following system :
>
> In[1]:= equations = {5/(x + y) == 2/y, Dt[5/(x + y) == 2/y, =
> t], Dt[x, t]
> == 1, x == 5}
>
> As you can see, Solve manages very well to find Dt[y,t] :
>
> In[2]:= Solve[equations, Dt[y, t]]
>
> Out[2]= {{Dt[y, t] -> 2/3}}
>
> Why isn't Reduce able to find the solution?
>
> In[3]:= Reduce[equations, Dt[y, t]]
>
> Out[3]= False
>
> Regards, and thanks to all who will answer!
>
> Florian Jaccard
>
>
The reason is (I am speculating here a bit) that Reduce attempts to
solve all kind of equations, not essentially algebraic ones, so it
does treat the derivatives in your equations as such rather than as
mere names of variables occurring in the equations. Taking this into
account your two equations
In[42]:= Reduce[{Dt[x, t] == 1, x == 5}]
Out[42]= False
appear to be inconsistent, since the derivative of a constant can't be
one.
If you remove the equation Dt[x, t] == 1,the system will be solved:
Reduce[{5/(x + y) == 2/y,
-((5*(Dt[x, t] + Dt[y, t]))/(x + y)^2) ==
-((2*Dt[y, t])/y^2), x == 5}, {y, x, Dt[y, t]}]
y == 10/3 && x == 5 && Dt[y, t] == 0
Note that this is a consistent solution (y is a constant and hence
Dt[y,t]==0). If you include both Dt[x,t] and Dt[y,t] in the list of
variables you will get a different looking solution:
Reduce[{5/(x + y) == 2/y, -((5*(Dt[x, t] + Dt[y, t]))/(x + y)^2) ==
-((2*Dt[y, t])/y^2), x == 5}, {y, x, Dt[y, t], Dt[x, t]}]
y == 10/3 && x == 5 && Dt[x, t] == (3*Dt[y, t])/2
Note that this is also consistent (even though both Dt[x, t] and Dt[y,
t] must actually be zero).
Also, note that if you removed from the system the equation x==5
instead of Dt[x,t]==1 you will not get a solution:
Reduce[{5/(x + y) == 2/y, -((5*(Dt[x, t] + Dt[y, t]))/(x + y)^2) ==
-((2*Dt[y, t])/y^2), Dt[x, t] == 1}, Dt[y, t]]
During evaluation of In[39]:= Reduce::nsmet:This system cannot be
solved with the methods available to Reduce. >>
Reduce[{5/(x + y) == 2/y,
-((5*(Dt[x, t] + Dt[y, t]))/(x + y)^2) ==
-((2*Dt[y, t])/y^2), Dt[x, t] == 1}, Dt[y, t]]
This is not surprising since in order to compute Dt[y,t], you would
need to solve a differential equation, which it does not do. However,
if you include both Dt[y,t] and Dt[x,t] among the variables to be
solved for the system will be solved, since Reduce will now express
one of the derivatives in terms of the other and y in terms of x (so
it does not have to express them in terms of t)
Reduce[{5/(x + y) == 2/y,
-((5*(Dt[x, t] + Dt[y, t]))/(x + y)^2) ==
-((2*Dt[y, t])/y^2), Dt[x, t] == 1},
{Dt[y, t], Dt[x, t], x, y}]
Dt[y, t] == 2/3 && Dt[x, t] == 1 && y == (2*x)/3 &&
x != 0
Finally, instead of the differential equation Dt[x, t] == 1 you use
one of its solutions, for example, x==t, you will get:
Reduce[{5/(x + y) == 2/y, -((5*(Dt[x, t] + Dt[y, t]))/(x + y)^2) ==
-((2*Dt[y, t])/y^2), x == t}, {Dt[y, t], x, y}, Reals]
(t < 0 || t > 0) && Dt[y, t] == 2/3 && x == t &&
y == (2*x)/3
or
Reduce[{5/(x + y) == 2/y, -((5*(Dt[x, t] + Dt[y, t]))/(x + y)^2) ==
-((2*Dt[y, t])/y^2), x == t}, {Dt[y, t], Dt[x, t], x, y}, Reals]
(t < 0 || t > 0) && Dt[x, t] == (3*Dt[y, t])/2 &&
x == t && y == (2*x)/3
All of these look to me like valid and useful answers, demonstrating
that Reduce can be used even in contexts in which I would not have
tried to use it before I saw your post ;-)
Andrzej Kozlowski
- References:
- Solve vs Reduce
- From: "Jaccard Florian" <Florian.Jaccard@he-arc.ch>
- Solve vs Reduce