Re: Question about diference between Animate and Manipulate
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg90456] Re: Question about diference between Animate and Manipulate
- From: "David Park" <djmpark at comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:33:20 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <g51ugl$71h$1@smc.vnet.net>
Well, they have a different appearance and a different set of options.
Nevertheless Manipulate can usually substitute for Animate.
While we are on the subject of Animate, I wonder if anyone else has problems
with 'sticky' Animates? That is, ones that stop after a certain amount of
time, even though the AnimationRepetitions has a default value of Infinity.
If one clicks the Pause/Play control they will usually start and run for a
while and then stop again. For example, this happens for me with the second
example in the Animate Help.
Animate[ArrayPlot[CellularAutomaton[n, {{1}, 0}, {40, All}]], {n, 0,
255, 1}]
Also, would it be possible to obtain an animation that ran in a particular
way without any controls at all? Now, Animate has a minimun mandatory set of
controls.
--
David Park
djmpark at comcast.net
http://home.comcast.net/~djmpark/
"Camille JORDAN" <ynceraj at gmail.com> wrote in message
news:g51ugl$71h$1 at smc.vnet.net...
> Have a question.
> Reading the documentation of Mathematica 6.0.3 for Animate and
> Manipulate does not seem to be a lot of a diference between the
> Animate and the Manipulate command.
> Can someone point me what is the biggest difference between them?
> Seems to me they are the same.
>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Question about diference between Animate and
- From: Syd Geraghty <sydgeraghty@mac.com>
- Re: Re: Question about diference between Animate and