Re: Stacked Definitions
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg93556] Re: Stacked Definitions
- From: Albert Retey <awnl at gmx-topmail.de>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:35:03 -0500 (EST)
- References: <gfimim$g0o$1@smc.vnet.net>
Nikolaus Rath schrieb: > Hello, > > If I make a definition of the form > > temp[42][3] = 7 > > where is this rule stored? I would have expected it to be in > DownValues[temp] or DownValues[temp[42]], but the first list is empty > and the second gives a syntax error. looks like a logic followup to your last post :-) The definition is here: SubValues[temp] I just realized that SubValues misses an own homepage in the documentation, but the good old ?SubValues still works... hth, albert