Re: Comparison between Mathematica and other symbolic systems
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg92402] Re: [mg92378] Comparison between Mathematica and other symbolic systems
- From: "peter lindsay" <pl.0 at me.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:46:19 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200809301133.HAA21932@smc.vnet.net>
hello Paolo I'm not sure direct comparison and discussion of other products is encouraged in this forum. It might be better to ask experts directly? Peter 2008/9/30 Paolo Bientinesi <pauldj at aices.rwth-aachen.de> > Hi everybody, > > As part of a presentation to students, I will have to support the > claim that "Mathematica is better than other systems when it comes to > symbolic computations". Some experts in other systems will be > giving a 15 min presentation to convince the audience of the contrary, > and then it will be my turn. > > At this point I am quite clueless on how to make my point across. > First of all, I am not at all familiar with any other system's > symbolic toolboxes, so I don't know what are the weaknesses. Also, I > am not sure what kind of demo could really make an impression on > graduate students and colleagues. > > Has any of you any experience on this? Ideas? Suggestions? > > Thank you! > -- > Prof. Paolo Bientinesi, Ph.D. > RWTH Aachen University, AICES > pauldj at aices.rwth-aachen.de > pauldj at alumni.cs.utexas.edu >
- References:
- Comparison between Mathematica and other symbolic systems
- From: Paolo Bientinesi <pauldj@aices.rwth-aachen.de>
- Comparison between Mathematica and other symbolic systems