Re: Which editor do you use for math articles

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg95482] Re: Which editor do you use for math articles*From*: "Guy Lamouche" <noemail at noemail.com>*Date*: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 05:43:28 -0500 (EST)*References*: <200901161109.GAA14132@smc.vnet.net> <gkscfe$eet$1@smc.vnet.net> <200901181032.FAA13939@smc.vnet.net> <gl1bvc$9hb$1@smc.vnet.net>

In the Windows world, BaKoMa TeX Word is WYSIWYG, has friendly installation, and now performs reasonably well. A bit more expensive than it used to be, but still very reasonable. Constantly updated. Very useful since you can both edit the WYSIWYG window or the basic LaTeX file simultaneously. Guy Lamouche "Andrzej Kozlowski" <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl> wrote in message news:gl1bvc$9hb$1 at smc.vnet.net... > > On 18 Jan 2009, at 11:32, AES wrote: > >> [Unless your TeX input has some error, in which case the typeset >> output >> will only appear up a point where the error occurs; a description and >> explanation of the error will appear in a third "log window" -- and >> hitting some other key combo will take you back to the input window >> **with the cursor positioned at the point or line where the error was >> encountered".] >> >> This has been the case for many years. > > Amazing. That means they must have produced a mind-reading version of > TeX that I am not aware of. In all versions that I know (and I have > been using TeX,LateX,Ams-Latex etc for decades) the cursor will appear > not at the place where the error (for example a missing right brace }) > occurred but at the place where TeX first notices some inconsistency > with its syntax - which is almost never the place where the error > actually occurred. At that point you have got to manually find the > actual error, which can be far from simple. The only TeX > implementation that I know that partly gets around this problem is the > Mac TeX system Textures > (http://www.bluesky.com/products/products_frames.html > ), which continually typesets your output as you type (without the > need to hit any keys), which usually will make you aware of an error > as soon as it occurs rather than much later, when you try to typeset > the you course code. Moreover, Textures has several other nice > features that are implemented only imperfectly in other versions. But > there are major caveats - a Mac OS X version is still only in beta, > years after Mac OS X occurred, and Textures costs hundreds of dollars. > But, and here is something anyone considering TeX should carefully > ponder upon. Before Mac OS X appeared, there were many persons > (including myself) willing to pay hundreds of dollars for Textures and > more for regular upgrades, in spite of the fact that lots of free TeX > implementations have always existed on the Mac (I myself now use TeX > Shop with Japanese PTex engine). This was because TeXtures avoids the > huge amount of hassle that installing and using TeX is for any > beginner and even for an experienced user. Then Blue Sky, the company > that makes Textures, failed to come up with a Mac OS X compatible > version and most users reluctantly drifted away to other programs. But > if you look mailing lists where TeX on Mac OS is discussed you will > find that many are intending to return (even though it will cost them > money) as soon as a full featured version is again available. Which > only proves that standard, free implementations of TeX are far form > the sort of thing some make them out to be. I strongly recommend you > to try TeX, but I suspect you will be soon back to using Mathematica > (if not Word). > > Andrzej Kozlowski >

**References**:**Which editor do you use for math articles***From:*TL <latev@shaw.ca>

**Re: Which editor do you use for math articles***From:*AES <siegman@stanford.edu>

**Re: Solving the Quintic: Correction to x^5 + 20 x + 32 == 0 root example**

**Re: Interval arithmetic and Dependency problems**

**Re: Re: Which editor do you use for math articles**

**Re: Which editor do you use for math articles**