Re: Problem with parallel evaluation of integrals depending on a
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg99913] Re: Problem with parallel evaluation of integrals depending on a
- From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 06:44:45 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <guqv83$a4n$1@smc.vnet.net>
Hi,
and have you shared the definition of F[] with the
second kernel ?
Regards
Jens
Alan Barhorst wrote:
> Hello, I am hoping someone can help me. I am trying to pass something
> like:
>
> G[s_]:=Integrate[F[x],{x,0,S}]
> NIntegrate[G[s],{s,0,1}]
>
> to parallel kernels. The operation is successful in the base kernel
> but fails in the other kernels due to the interior integral not being
> evaluated. The error is as follows.
>
> NIntegrate::"inumr" : "The integrand ( SubsuperscriptBox[ =E2=88=A7 , 0 ,
> \
> S ] Sin[ SubscriptBox[ =CF=86$10572 , 11 ]\ SubscriptBox[ =CF=88$10572 ,
> 11 ] [x]] \
> =C2=AE=EF=A1=BFx ) SubscriptBox[\"F$10572\", \"1\"] [S] has evaluated to non-
> numerical \
> values for all sampling points in the region with boundaries {{0, 1}}."
>
> For some reason the upper bound of the interior integral is not
> replaced with the grid points on {0,1} in the parallel evaluation. I
> have Distributed the global variable definitions to the kernels after
> the function G[s] have been defined.
>
> I have tried several things to break this loose but have been
> unsuccessful. Any pointers are appreciated.
>
>
> AB
> ________________________________________________________
> Alan A. Barhorst, PhD, PE | alan.barhorst at ttu.edu
> Professor | http://www.me.ttu.edu/
> Mechanical Engineering | Phone: 806-742-3563, ext 241
> Texas Tech University
> Lubbock, TX 79409-1021
>
> When leaders disregard the law and human dignity, kooks
> are emboldened; innocence lost.
>
> Human potential cannot be developed or measured from a
> floating moral reference frame.
> ________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>