MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Faster alternative to AppendTo?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg102911] Re: [mg102886] Faster alternative to AppendTo?
  • From: Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu>
  • Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 04:01:45 -0400 (EDT)
  • Organization: Mathematics & Statistics, Univ. of Mass./Amherst
  • References: <200909010753.DAA18801@smc.vnet.net>
  • Reply-to: murray at math.umass.edu

There's a package Collatz.m that's long been distributed with 
Mathematica. For Mathematica 7, it's in:

   $InstallationDirectory\Documentation\English\System\ExampleData

You can copy the definitions from that .m file and try it directly 
without having to load the package:

    Collatz[1] := {1}
    Collatz[n_Integer]:= Prepend[Collatz[3 n + 1], n] /; OddQ[n] && n > 0
    Collatz[n_Integer] := Prepend[Collatz[n/2], n] /; EvenQ[n] && n > 0

   Collatz[1000000];//Timing
{1.0842*10^-19, Null}         (* on my PC *)


Dem_z wrote:
> Hey, sorry I'm really new. I only started using mathematica recently, so I'm not that savvy.
> 
> Anyways, I wrote some code to calculate (and store) the orbits around numbers in the Collatz conjecture.
> 
> "Take any whole number n greater than 0. If n is even, we halve it (n/2), else we do "triple plus one" and get 3n+1. The conjecture is that for all numbers this process converges to 1. "
>  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collatz_conjecture
> 
> 
> (*If there's no remainder, divides by 2, else multiply by 3 add 1*)
> g[n_] := If[Mod[n, 2] == 0, n/2, 3 n + 1]
> 
> (*creates an empty list a. Loops and appends the k's orbit into variable "orbit", which then appends to variable "a" after the While loop is completed.  New m, sets new k, which restarts the While loop again.*)
> a = {};
> Do[
>   k = m;
>   orbit = {k};
>   While[k > 1, AppendTo[orbit, k = g[k]]];
>   AppendTo[a, orbit];
>   , {m, 2,1000000}];
> 
> Anyways it seems that the AppendTo function gets exponentially slower, as you throw more data into it. Is there a way to make this more efficient? To calculate a million points takes days with this method.
> 

-- 
Murray Eisenberg                     murray at math.umass.edu
Mathematics & Statistics Dept.
Lederle Graduate Research Tower      phone 413 549-1020 (H)
University of Massachusetts                413 545-2859 (W)
710 North Pleasant Street            fax   413 545-1801
Amherst, MA 01003-9305


  • Prev by Date: Re: Two Questions
  • Next by Date: Re: Faster alternative to AppendTo?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Faster alternative to AppendTo?
  • Next by thread: Re: Faster alternative to AppendTo?