MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: Incorrect symbolic improper integral


Isn't this integral easier to do analytically? The poles are at +/-i. Write=
 cos(ax) as (Exp(iax)+Exp(-iax))/2. First part you have to complete the con=
tour around the upper half plane, second part round the lower (or vice vers=
a if a is negative - all assumes a is real).  All of which gives integral a=
s pi Exp(-Abs(a)), set a=1 and you get pi/e - as you say a pretty result!
________________________________________
From: mathgroup-adm at smc.vnet.net [mathgroup-adm at smc.vnet.net] On Behalf Of =
Bayard Webb [bayard.webb at mac.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:59 AM
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
Subject: [mg103638] [mg103606] Re: [mg103586] Incorrect symbolic improper integral

I think you need to add a as a coefficient of x everywhere, including
the squared term.

In[6]:= Assuming[a \[Element] Reals,
  Integrate[Cos[a x]/(1 + (a x)^2), {x, -\[Infinity], \[Infinity]}]]

Out[6]= \[Pi]/(E Abs[a])

Setting a = 1 yields Mathematica's previous result.

Bayard

On Sep 29, 2009, at 4:38 AM, jwmerrill at gmail.com wrote:

Below is a definite integral that Mathematica does incorrectly.
Thought someone might like to know:

In[62]:= Integrate[Cos[x]/(1 + x^2), {x, -\[Infinity], \[Infinity]}]

Out[62]= \[Pi]/E

What a pretty result--if it were true. The correct answer is \[Pi]*Cosh
[1], which can be checked by adding a new parameter inside the
argument of Cos and setting it to 1 at the end:

In[61]:= Integrate[Cos[a x]/(1 + x^2), {x, -\[Infinity], \[Infinity]},
  Assumptions -> a \[Element] Reals]

Out[61]= \[Pi] Cosh[a]

Regards,

Jason Merrill





  • Prev by Date: Re: Resume an aborted calculation?
  • Next by Date: Re: Incorrect symbolic improper integral
  • Previous by thread: Re: Incorrect symbolic improper integral
  • Next by thread: Re: Incorrect symbolic improper integral