MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Why not a standard name used for this common function? DTFT

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg107648] Re: Why not a standard name used for this common function? DTFT
  • From: AES <siegman at stanford.edu>
  • Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:25:29 -0500 (EST)
  • Organization: Stanford University
  • References: <hlohi7$d7o$1@smc.vnet.net>

In article <hlohi7$d7o$1 at smc.vnet.net>,
 "Nasser M. Abbasi" <nma at 12000.org> wrote:

> It is nice that M7 added support for Discrete Time Fourier Transform (DTFT). 
> A very important transform.
> 
> http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/guide/FourierAnalysis.html
> 
> But I do not understand why it was named "FourierSequenceTransform". This 
> name is completely non-standard.

And I don't find any entry at all for that term in MathWorld . . . ???


  • Prev by Date: Manipulate piecewise functions,
  • Next by Date: Re: multiple variables in pure function used in map.
  • Previous by thread: Why not a standard name used for this common function? DTFT
  • Next by thread: DiscreteUniformDistribution PDF isn't piecewise?